franklanguage: (Cracka-Cola)
[personal profile] franklanguage
How do you graciously return a gift from Heifer International? It seems one of my well-meaning clients will be giving her corporate gifts from them, and if so I may be a recipient.

Considering that the gift is given in your name to someone else, it's especially tricky. I certainly don't want a cow slaughtered in my name—although they also do goats, sheep, and bees.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-24 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] v3g4n.livejournal.com
You could give it to a food bank. There are plenty of families who do eat meat that have little money.

It's not like she's giving me a sheep!

Date: 2008-11-24 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] franklanguage.livejournal.com
I'm saying I'd rather have a tree planted in my name, or a bag of rice given to a third-world family, but with Heifer, I don't have any choice. As far as I could see in the brochure, they were all animal-based products.

I mean, it's not as clear-cut as returning a scarf you hate for store credit.

Re: It's not like she's giving me a sheep!

Date: 2008-11-24 07:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] v3g4n.livejournal.com
Can you bring this up? If you can't, and you can't return it... then donate it to those in need who would consume animal products anyways.

Re: It's not like she's giving me a sheep!

Date: 2008-11-24 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] v3g4n.livejournal.com
Oh sorry, I didn't understand what Heifer was until I read the comments below. You don't actually receive anything... those things are given in your name? I understand now.

I don't feel comfortable judging whether or not an impoverished community should want/get an animal to raise and eventually eat. I choose to be vegan in my context but I don't want to make that decision for others. I think I'd be okay with this gift, though I wouldn't go out of my way to give it on my own!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-24 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suegypt.livejournal.com
You can't return a gift given in your name. You just get a card; the Heifer International clients get (probably already have) the money to buy a cow or bees or I think they even plants and such, so it's not all animal gifts.

And these animals are not all used for slaughter, many are used for milk and eggs, honey, and for wool, etc. I'm assuming you are a vegan? From what I know, this is a well-run organization that truly is helping subsistence farmers be independent and healthy, it's not about raising incredible numbers of animals for slaughter/profit.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-24 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] franklanguage.livejournal.com
As an abolitionist, I don't condone animal husbandry, so why would I want a milking cow or a beehive given in my name? That's what I'm getting at.

These animals are ultimately for slaughter, even if they give milk and eggs—particularly in the third world. Think about it.

Oh, and lastly, dairy causes health problems, particularly in non-white people; I thought you knew that?
Edited Date: 2008-11-24 06:57 pm (UTC)

Perhaps the gift will be used to plant trees.

Date: 2008-11-24 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suegypt.livejournal.com
Please don't get offended, all I'm saying is that the gift is given in your name, hence you have no control, you can't give it back because it won't be in your possession. The only thing you could do is send the client back her card saying "I don't believe in this." I can't imagine that not being received poorly.

I'm not saying anything about your beliefs, because I don't know much about you. I'm actually a bit sympathetic, because I can imagine if someone gave a gift in my name to, say, the NRA, I would be appalled. It's a bit presumptuous to do that for business associates, because you don't know if you're offending someone.

Yes, I know that people also eat their animals as well as use their "gifts," but giving an animal to a third world family is more about enabling them to survive in this world without having to be a slave than it is about serving my or your world view. I'm not terribly knowledgeable about this, but I would wonder if people living in the third world can afford to be vegan. How can we who can choose veganism begrudge those who can't the things they need to survive, especially in a small community setting?

I thought you knew that?

Um, I don't know what you know... how do you know what I know??


(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-24 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagda-ollathir.livejournal.com
not to mention the env. impact- animal ag isn't very sustainable.

Now I'm wondering...

Date: 2008-11-25 01:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] franklanguage.livejournal.com
Is a vegan farm actually possible? Most people say it isn't, and any biodynamic farms I know of rely heavily on animals to create the "dynamic" aspect. Conventional wisdom says most animals have to eat animals to survive, and veganism is just an aberration. Even chimpanzees and gorillas eat some meat.

So isn't veganism just a luxury, considering that it's so rare for humans to be vegan? Even Ted Danson puts his stamp of approval on Heifer International.

Re: Now I'm wondering...

Date: 2008-11-25 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suegypt.livejournal.com
I think veganism is a chosen discipline (I am not vegan, so i'm just giving an opinion formed by admiration) and is not natural to humans, who are omnivorous in the "wild." Like chimps and other high primates, in the wild, if we were in the trees and forests, I imagine we would eat mostly vegetables and fruit, grains and nuts, with meat from capture or hunting.

As we became "civilized," one of the first things we humans did was invent agriculture. Bread was the great life-saver. But, through the ages, most of us ate meat and certainly milk and eggs, etc when they were available. Because this meat-eating wasn't dictated to us back thousands of years ago like it might be now by our present-day society, I believe this was our natural way. The choice of vegetarianism and veganism goes against nature for most of us, but is not a negative thing to my thinking. But it is a choice. And a choice of someone with many options to select from.

A vegan farm? With just kitties and doggies running around free, no cows, chickens? No horses used to plow, no bees to make honey? I guess you could plant seeds with machines, harvest them with machines and human labor. Have grains, nut and fruit trees, fields of corn and vegetables. But it would probably take much more work in the US, and might be marginalized out of existence by the big corporation farms.

I'd like to think we could support vegan farming. But, yes, in a poor country where people have to fit for themselves, it is natural and necessary, I'd argue, for people to eat and use the gifts of animals.

Re: Now I'm wondering...

Date: 2008-11-25 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagda-ollathir.livejournal.com
Yeah, it’s pretty possible… there are some sustainable eco-communities with vegans who maintain their own mini farms… it’s really easy to set up diff. plants to keep the soil healthy without using animal poop for fertilizer.
We’re not wild animals, and we can survive being vegan, so we should stay vegan.

I don’t consider it a luxury- the diet of most impoverished countries are largely vegan (I remember reading Wangari Mathai’s autobio, and she mentioned how the only meat her family would ever eat was chicken, but her mother never wanted to (they had to cook chicken when she wasn’t at home, because her mom did not want animals killed for food). & if you look at their health (before other social forces stepped in to mess with the food supply), they’re really healthy off a largely plant based diets. & considering in most 3rd world countries, meat is the luxury item in their diet…
Page generated Jun. 2nd, 2025 05:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »